3 Strategy - Framework 3.3 Political and Legal Issues

3.3.2 Long Term Legal and Political Framework

Limits of the Current International Law as It Applies to a Long Term Model

  • UN Legitimacy? The United Nations encourages the exploration of Outer Space. Very recently, during UNISPACE III, this aspect of space activities was underlined. In the development of the strategy, the United Nations will have a major role. At all stages the Secretary General should be kept informed. If we follow the requirements of current space law, the more we develop space activities, the more decision-makers input will be needed. Once we have established stations and habitats for humans on different planets, the role of the UN will diminish progressively and probably transition into a new form of organization.
     
  • Registration Convention: The basic principles of the Registration Convention were created to consolidate international regulation of outer space.

The preamble of this convention states that "a mandatory system of registering objects launched into outer space would assist in their identification and would contribute to the application and development of international law governing the exploration and use of outer space."

The Registration State retains jurisdiction and control over an object launched in outer space and over its personnel. If we follow the Registration Convention, a space settlement built in free space from materials originating from the Earth and registered by the launching state is most likely to remain under the continued supervision and control of the state concerned. What is the mechanism in the case of an exploration project initiated on a planet other than Earth?

The links between a state and a space object or a person will be less and less justified for space settlements and new civilizations. In the case of a settlement in outer space, registration will disappear as future generations will live and grow on different planets and new materials will be built in outer space.

  • Responsibility and Liability: Article VI of the OST gives the principle of international responsibility for all national activities outside terrestrial space.

When space activities take place on Mars, on the Moon, or on another planet, the current international order will not exist any more, but there might be other requirements for identification purposes. There may be no national activities linked with a state party, because a new society could have taken its place and all the distinct nationalities that we know would have blended to create a new community.

Concerning the principle of liability of the launching state, this concept also will disappear in the long-term. Until recently, most of the space activities had a link with Earth through registration and launch. In the case of an extra-terrestrial settlement, we will not link the liability to the launching states as the launch may occur from an asteroid!

  • Statute of the Astronaut: Article V of the Astronauts Agreement and Articles 10 and 12 of the Moon Agreement were established to provide, search and rescue for astronauts in the event of accident, distress, or emergency landing.

In the Outer Space Treaty, astronauts are considered envoys of mankind. The idea was that "envoy" astronauts should enjoy jurisdictional immunity. This notion, which contained a humanitarian character, was not followed up in subsequent treaties. In the first phase of a settlement on a different planet (before a definitive settlement) we will have to look at separate rules that could apply to "new categories" of astronauts (e.g. commander, visitors, research scientists, etc.). In the second phase, when future generations will be settled in free space, no specific status will be justified any more.

The term "astronaut" implies the notion of navigation (persons who sail among the stars). The Soviet Union favored the term "cosmonaut" (persons who navigate the Universe). As these notions imply navigation, they seem to be obsolete. "In the future, the use of a general term such as 'persons' would seem far more appropriate" (Cheng, 1997).

International law, as it exists today, does not answer the questions that will arise at the time of settlement away from Earth. We have to think about the evolution of space law. We can prepare this step by looking at the governance of future settlements.

Governance of Future Settlements

Is Earth to determine the shape or nature of governance in space?

  • A different environment

Space is a different environment from any that we have known before. Thus laws governing the behavior of people and societies in space must take those differences into account.

Problems will arise from the attempt to apply old or unsatisfactory social systems on a new environment. Previous governing entities will no longer have any moral right to rule the settlement and will not possess any methods of enforcement. The 1991 Biosphere 2 experiment, which placed 8 people in isolation for a planned period of 2 years, showed that one part of the group wanted to strictly follow orders issued by mission control while the other part was leaning towards more self-determination.

Even though current policy and law structures (refer to 3.3.1) are applicable to the precursor mission and the immediate future, it is likely that new structures might appear necessary in case of a space settlement, such as described in the project's long-term outlook (see section 2.6.4). Space colonies will soon feel the need to gain independence from Earth and create their own structures in order to be able to manage their settlement. They will be facing a new environment. They will want to develop new ways of responding to new constraints. They will have new drivers for their political and social organizations. They might want to get rid of structures that no longer serve a purpose; and, as an autonomous community, they might want to create ways to establish and protect their own freedom.

"All of the work done to date constitutes little more than a preface to the task of working out a scheme of governance for space societies."

Ragosta & Reynolds

  • A different population

Space settlements do have the following characteristics in the initial stages: small population, common goals, crowding, isolation from Earth and unusual environments, being hostile or not. These settlements bear some similarities with certain groups on Earth.

As an analogy, experiences with Antarctic bases or other isolated environments where significant numbers of people must work together have demonstrated that some organizational methods, such as hierarchical or military models, do not work well in such circumstances. On a base in Antarctica, the key persons are not the leader or the eminent scientist, but the cook and the radio operator.

Norms will be needed for populations to survive and expand. Changes in behavior and society might lead to changes in policy making. New settlements will have their own culture, their own ethics and their own ways to provide order to the society. A governance might rise from a new world, creating innovative means to address new conflicts should they arise.

"Clearly some other forms of governance should, and probably will, emerge, either by design, evolution, or revolution once larger, permanent settlements arise."

J. Dator

  • A different evolution

What would be better: establishing restrictions on government activity or dictating affirmative statements of rights? It is difficult to draft principles for the governance of societies that do not yet exist, not knowing fully which problems or conflicts such a society might have to deal with. Space settlements may become ideal political experimentation laboratories. If failure does happen it would have to be the result of the underlying philosophy of the political model.

Actual complaints against organizations fall mainly into three categories: too much bureaucracy, not enough democracy, and too much repression. Should some form of democracy be chosen, it should find a way to guarantee the civil and political freedom of space inhabitants. Settlements should seek to achieve a balance between community safety and individual survival within a unique environment. That interdependence will come from society members' creativity and best efforts to achieve this goal. An ideal organization should be based on structure, and the structure should be based on functions and on requirements.

"Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice. It is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved."

William Jennings Bryan

  • A different governance

Instead of elected governments, small groups may prefer to reach decisions via consensus. But what about larger groups? The project's long-term outlook pictures a spaceship that would house "at least one thousand people." What kind of governance and regulatory system should they choose to achieve common goals and ensure the well being of the entire community? Several possibilities arise, and the settlement will have to assess which one of these is best for their future: Gradual or immediate independence? Democracy or some other model like communism or technocracy? Leadership by authority, by ability, or by function? People's will? Self-government as a sovereign nation? No regulation of the group's population or birth control? Status of individual property?

What is to become of space law as we know it? Space law was established tacitly implying its connection with Earth (i.e. nationality of astronauts, registration state, launching state, etc.). It is not possible to extrapolate today which regulatory system the new settlements might want to implement when the link with Earth is severed, if it ever is.

We must not forget the possible effects of new technology development in areas such as biology, electronic communications, and artificial intelligence. One can imagine that these technologies might be widely used to provide control in a society. One can even think of a growing use of electronic direct democracy deriving from the slow disappearance of state systems. These technologies will be in full growth. The means to regulate them will be created accordingly.


This new set of rules will form what is to be one of the legal areas of greatest importance.

"Prediction is very hard, especially when it's about the future."

Yogi Berra

NEXT >


[Home] [Web Development Team] [ISU]